Thursday, June 25, 2020

Dicamba Opinion


With the recent drama around dicamba and the use of those products in RR2Xtend® soybeans this season, it begs the question of what the future may entail for dicamba.  As a field rep, I don’t have any special insight or “inside information” on the issue, but I have noticed some interesting developments:
·      It has been known for quite some time that the federal label was set to expire in December 2020 for ExtendiMax™, Enginia™, and Fexepan™.  Activity by Bayer® and BASF® regarding the renewal process and/or the attempt to garner renewal has been very quiet
·      
           There has been limited public statements or advertising from Bayer® and/or BASF® addressing the pending situation

·         Bayer® has announced it will abandon its construction efforts on a dicamba plant in Louisiana http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---35631.htm

·          The insight from around the country is Bayer® has moved most all of their soybean production this summer (targeted for the 2021 growing season) to XtendFlex® - a three-way herbicide stack of glyphosate, glufosinate (Liberty™), and dicamba
·          I’ve recently read and written about links of dicamba to cancer http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---35137-e.htm

·          Bayer® is currently trying to settle glyphosate and cancer litigation at a price tag around US$10 bil, making the company very sensitive to any further litigation exposure

·         Bayer® has plans in the soybean pipeline of additional herbicide stacks that will provide growers with several options in the near future.  This will help minimize the long-term risk around losing the use of dicamba  http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---34165.htm

·         The federal government will have increased pressure to institute new strategies and criteria to approve pesticides while keeping human and environment risk low.  This may or may not include the EPA and garners the question of – will the EPA and/or feds approve any controversial chemicals while a new review system is being developed?   http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail---35698.htm
Don’t get me wrong, I hope dicamba is available in 2021 for use in soybeans in our region and across the US, but it looks like a steep (not impossible) hill to climb at this point.  Dicamba has proven itself as a valuable tool with great performance and it mixes very easily in the spray tank for application.  Also, as we evaluate the Group 00 and Group 0 soybean maturity zones in our region, most of our best varieties today do contain RR2Xtend technology.  Lastly, Pioneer has a significant portion of our seed production in the area dedicated to varieties with dicamba technology and thus the industry may have concerns meeting demand if growers insist on having stacked herbicide technologies in their soybean seed for 2021.
If dicamba is unavailable due to regulatory issues in soybeans next year, farmers will have primarily the following stacked herbicide technology options available for soybean planting next season:
-          -- Enlist-3® soybeans with 2,4-D choline, glyphosate and glufosinate (Liberty™) post-emerge herbicide technology options
-          -- XtendFlex® soybeans with only glyphosate and glufosinate (Liberty™) post-emerge technology options (dicamba technology present, but unavailable to utilize)

 --    Alite27® soybeans or otherwise known as “BalanceBeans” from BASF® https://www.agriculture.com/news/crops/basf-s-alite-27-soybean/... with isoxaflutole (BalancePro™) technology as a pre-emerge herbicide and then glyphosate and glufosinate (Liberty) technologies available post-emerge.  At this time, only a few select US counties have BalancePro™ as a pre-emerge product approved for use in Alite27® soybean varieties.

No comments:

Post a Comment