Monday, March 15, 2021

March 15, 2021 Edition

 


“Now, what problems are we having on offense?” - John Gigliardi head football coach at halftime with his team up 35-0

 

Despite any given situation, there is always room for improvement.  Sometimes the situation may look so bleak that improvement is the only option going forward (commodity markets in July of 2020).  However, there are situations where things are going well and most would just hope to maintain the momentum.  Usually, it takes a unique individual to take a good situation and continue to find ways to push forward to make it even better.

Coach Gigliardi (pronounced Gil-ardi) was one of those folks and a big reason why he is the winningest football coach in college history (486 career wins).  You most likely have never heard of the guy as he coached at the Div. III institution of St. John’s University in central Minnesota.  Regardless of his team’s position during a game, season, or off-season, John didn’t let-up on his focus to keep the program’s football team at a consistent high level as well as provide the student athlete a rewarding college experience. 

Many large farms have been highly successful over the past half-dozen seasons despite the depressed farm economy – they just have a knack at finding ways to succeed no matter the circumstances.  Now that the agriculture landscape is changing again, new challenges will arise and I’m sure many of you will continue to find ways to challenge your teams and maintain your status as top farm operations in the region.  Good luck!

If you’d like to read more on coach John Gigliardi, check out Boz Bostrom’s book on John’s life, “Legacy Unrivaled”:  https://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Unrivaled-Story-John-Gagliardi/dp/168134016X


Regional Weather

The above average conditions are forecasted to continue again for the week, and we’ll even have some mornings without freezing.  It’s starting to be very difficult to even find snow in the tree rows!  Our next chance of significant precipitation looks to be forming for the first part of next week. 

Well, I couldn’t even get out a soil temp chart for the region before a couple farm operations found a chance to sow a quarter or two of spring wheat.  It’s not very often we get the chance to place some seed in the ground before May (let alone before April), but taking a roll of the dice doesn’t intimidate too many large successful farm managers.



This soil temperature chart (oFahrenheit) comes from NDAWN at 9 am Monday, March 15th.  As you can see, most locations are bordering on the frost/freeze point in the top 1-2 foot of soil depth.  There is some slightly warmer soil much deeper.  Fargo, Logan Center, Carrington, Maddock, and Williston all have soil temperatures above 32.0F at all depths – some locations, like Logan Center, just barely make the cut.

I’ll count on your weather app for the best guidance through the 7-8 day forecast, but looking beyond that, I’ve found this site from National Oceanic Atmospheric Association (NOAA) to be fairly reliable for a general 8-14 day outlook (next week). 

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/814day/index.php

For the fourth full week of March, the forecast is towards significantly warmer than average potential for temperatures.  Regarding the precipitation chances, they remain below average for central and western North Dakota, and above average for northwestern Minnesota.

The NOAA organization also provides three month outlooks.  If we would like to get a general forecast for the key months to start the upcoming growing season (May-June-July), it can be seen here:

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov.../long_range/seasonal.php?lead=3

This forecast currently predicts significantly above average chances on the temperature potential, along with equal chances for precipitation in northwestern Minnesota.  For most of North Dakota, the precipitation chances trend towards drier than average.  It continues to be a developing situation that points our thoughts and actions towards conserving soil moisture.


Pre-emerge Herbicide Concerns in a Dry Spring

I’ve fielded a few questions over the last couple weeks on pre-emerge herbicide use during a dry spring.  The farmer concerns are around the herbicide potentially volatilizing into the atmosphere or not providing much control if it has sit on the soil surface for numerous days to a couple weeks without a 0.5” to 1” rain for thorough incorporation.

Fortunately, most herbicides break-down by microbial activity and/or complex chemical reactions in moist soil (hydrolysis).  Therefore, these herbicides will remain stable on the soil surface in concentration for prolonged periods.  Yes, not all herbicides fall into this category and a couple do break down by sunlight and UV wavelengths. However, we typically apply these herbicides with immediate soil incorporation – Eptam® and Far-go® primarily come to mind.  The yellow herbicides of Sonalan®, Prowl®, and Treflan® also degrade by UV light and work best with soil incorporation.  Metolachlor (Dual®/EverpreX®) has recently been found to have some breakdown by sunlight as well – however, other similar herbicides in this class of chemistry are not affected.

Unfortunately, if conditions do remain dry and only minimal small rains of say 0.15” or less do occur, then usually the herbicide does not become fully activated.  However, the weeds have enough moisture to germinate and become established.  The good news is that unless the weeds get large (over ½” to ¾” tall) most good pre-herbicides will “reach-back” to provide control once that incorporating rain is received (Valor™, Zidua™, Sharpen, and sulfentrazone products).  Once the incorporating rain is received, a good activation period will ensue to prevent new weed seedlings from emerging.

https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/.../fate-of-soil-applied-herbicides-05-26-16

A 2016/’17 study by NDSU found that when incorporating rain was delayed 7 days after per-herbicide application, the pre-herbicide products of Fierce® (flumioxazin (Valor®) + pyroxasulfone (Zidua®)) and Spartan® (sulfrentrazone) maintained very strong weed kill performance.  Meanwhile, metribuzin (Sencor®) did degrade slightly in performance with a 7 day wait for incorporation.  Unfortunately, these were the only three herbicides tested in the trial.

https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/drought/crops/soybean-pre-herbicide-activation



Corn Herbicide Options from Corteva™

Having an early weed control mindset for our crops this season should help maintain a jump on the weeds and conserve moisture.  It seems like the weeds always seem tougher to kill post-emerge under dry conditions when they get some size.  In the corn, more and more operations are finding the early V-1 to V-3 crop growth stage is about perfect for applying a robust herbicide mix to control emerged weeds as well as adding some residual control.  For Corteva™ based options in our region, a couple ideas come to mind.

·       


  Keystone LA® NXT + WideMatch® – this herbicide mix is gaining popularity has it has minimal crop rotation restrictions.  Actechlor, atrazine, copyralid (Stinger®) and fluroxypyr (Starane®) are all in this mix.  If you add some glyphosate we’ll have at least a couple active ingredients targeting most weed species.  At an application rate for Keystone of 1.8 qts/ac, it equates to only 3/8 lb. of atrazine, providing adequate crop rotation flexibility.  Keystone label: https://...agrian-cg-fs1-production/pdfs/Keystone_LA_NXT1d_Label.pdf

·        


Resicore® - this product fits more of our corn-soybean-wheat farm operations, but is a robust pre-mix that does an outstanding job of  controlling all of our tough broadleaf weeds plus provide that critical residual control.  Resicore® contains acetochlor, mesiotrione, and copyralid.  Add some glyphosate and atrazine, and you have another great tank-mix combination of at least two to three active ingredients working together to control most weed species.  It’s the mesiotrione that gives us a crop rotation restriction of 18 months to sugarbeets, potatoes and dry edible beans.  Check the atrazine load as well.  Resicore® label: https://...agrian-cg-fs1-production/pdfs/Resicore1u_Label.pdf

·         Resolve Q® - If you are unwilling to apply HPPD inhibitors (like mesiotrione (Calisto®)) you most likely will struggle to control volunteer canola in your corn crop.  Therefore, Resolve Q® is a fantastic option to add to your tank-mix in the post-emerge application.  Resolve Q® has a 20” or seven collar crop growth stage application restriction, but works best on volunteer canola less than 4-5” in height.  Resolve Q is a pre-mix of rimsulfuron (Basis®) and thifensulfuron (a component of Affinity®).  https://...agrian-cg-fs1-production/pdfs/...Resolve_Q_Label.pdf



Corn Fertility Management

Even though you may be hitting strong yield levels in your corn production, is there room for improvement?  Earlier this winter, I had the pleasure of listening to one of our Pioneer managers down in the Texas panhandle (high dessert plains region) assisting his growers with top production practices.  If you’ve never experienced the area, they are significant into irrigated corn and alfalfa to support the large cattle feedlot operations in the region.  The elevation is 5-6000 feet in general with only about 10” of average annual precipitation.  Soils are fairly sandy with very low water holding capacity, thus the need to irrigate over 20” per summer for 98-107 RM corn hybrids.

Anyway, a few things from his presentation really stuck with me and some ideas we may look to implement in the Northern Plains.  First, was the emphasis on getting away from broadcast spreading dry fertilizer.  With our region’s high clay content and high pH soils (above 7.8 in many areas), having our fertilizer become plant available can be a challenge.  The primary method to over-come the obstacle is the banding of fertilizer in the fall or pre-plant in the spring.  This doesn’t have to be too complex with special equipment – no reason the air-seeder couldn’t perform some fertilizer only applications in the autumn.

If we evaluate an acre-furrow-slice (AFS) – that is a slice of soil covering one acre to a depth of 6” – it will generally weigh around 2.0 mil pounds.  A broadcast application of a dry blend (N-P-K-S-Zn) at 400 lbs/ac which is incorporated to a depth of 3”, results somewhere in the realm of 100 to 200 ppm concentration of fertilizer in the top half of the AFS.  On the flip side, banding can create zones of fertilizer concentration significantly much larger and thus less available for soil tie-up, making more fertilizer obtainable for plant uptake.


Second, was to implement more than one pass of fertility application in the corn crop.  As you know, corn is a very full season crop with a large nitrogen demand.  However, what you may not realize is how late in the season the plant needs a good portion of that nitrogen.  It is estimated that today’s corn hybrids need about 40% of their nitrogen requirement after the tassel growth stage.  So, for the end of July through the month of August in a 180 bu/ac corn crop in our region, the crop will require about 65-75 lbs/ac nitrogen in that time span alone. 

Another benefit from an in-season application would be to gain on the nitrogen use efficiency.  Often, the combination of banding fertilizer applications – pre-plant along with starter fertilizer use and at least one application side-dress, the nitrogen efficiency can be improved to 0.8 to 0.9 lbs N/bu corn produced.  If only a pre-plant broadcast application is applied, the recommendation moves to 1.2 to 1.3 lbs N/bu of Yield Goal.  I know our soils can hold more moisture and thus more nitrogen than the dessert high plains region, but I would bet we could improve both yields and nitrogen use efficiency in our region if we invested in a method to apply nitrogen to our corn crop at least once during the season and in combination with banding other fertilizer applications.

With better late season fertility, most operations are also able to maintain better late season plant health and standability.  Many folks look for plant health benefits from late season fungicides/ insecticides, but we shouldn’t forget about the nutrition aspect as well.  My guess would be the fertilizer probably has more of an impact on the overall impact of corn yield production and standability for our region than mid-season pesticide application.  Typically, we have very low presence (most years) of late season disease and insect pressure.

At the end of the day, nitrogen is just one component of the season’s corn fertility needs.  Don’t forget about the other elements like sulfur – typical corn production in our area needs 12-20 lbs/ac sulfur.

 

Product Spotlight: Instinct® NXTGEN

To continue with the topic of fertilizer management, not all farm operations have the time, manpower, and/or capital to apply nitrogen in two or more different applications to the crop.  Therefore, maybe there is an alternative solution to where we can improve our efficiency with our nitrogen dollars and still obtain top production goals.

Optinyte™ technology (nitrapyrin) has been around since the 1960’s, and there is plenty of university data out there to support the product and confirm that it performs as stated.  However, there has always been issues around the formulation and mixing thoroughly with the nitrogen source for it to gain significant traction.  Many manufacturers have tried to take the off-patent product and bring it to market, but they have also experienced valid concerns with the products ability to mix.  Anyway, Corteva has a new formulation out with Instinct® NXTGEN to use with urea and the product has dramatically improved the flowability and mixing for fertilizer retailers as well as in on-farm application systems.


In corn, split applications of nitrogen most often reveal a positive response and are viewed as an “ideal” nitrogen management program as a corn producer can modify the plan as needed on the fly.  If the spring has been wet and thus the potential high for nitrogen leaching or denitrification, then we may want to add more nitrogen than originally planned.  Conversely, if a fairly dry spring and the outlook for below average yields, then we may adjust downward on the nitrogen rate. 

In more heavy clay loam soils, our nitrogen applications are more protected from leaching due to the clay slowing the water infiltration movement through the soil profile.  However, under very wet saturated conditions nitrogen loss occurs to denitrification.  Optinyte® technology keeps the nitrogen stable under both leaching and denitrification scenarios.

If you have history of detecting nitrogen deficiency late season in corn, or you find yourself significantly above 1.1 lb of nitrogen planned per bushel of crop production goal, then nitrogen inhibitors should be considered and tested on the farm.

https://...agrian-cg-fs1-production/pdfs/Instinct_II_Label1i.pdf

NDSU has a nice publication on the topic from 2017 with a comprehensive evaluation of current products on the market.  https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/nitrogen-extenders-and-additives-for-field-crops



Product Spotlight (2): P9193AM


The last product in our series of new Pioneer corn genetics for the spring in our region is P9193AM.  It’s another strong agronomic hybrid with above average trait characteristic scores for drought, stress emergence, brittle-snap, late season standability, and Goss’s Wilt.  It’s medium for plant height at 91 RM (relative maturity).  Yield potential is solid as our IMPACT data reveals a bit more horsepower than other industry hybrids in the 90 RM zone – including P9188AM.  If this P9193AM can demonstrate as much consistency as P9188AM, we’ll have another strong hybrid in the 90 RM segment.

For a quick review, Pioneer rates their products on a 1-9 scale with 9 being the best/strongest/tallest.  Average characteristic performance scores are typically 4’s and 5’s; below average is 3, and above average strength would rate 6 to 7.  It is fairly rare to see an advanced product with a trait score of 8, but it does happen.  Most all products that would rate below a 3 on any given single agronomic score would not make it through the process to become a commercially available product.

There are enough units of this hybrid to be included in Pioneer’s PKP strip trial plots for the upcoming season, plus have some additional supply for large side-x-side comparisons against competitive hybrids.  If you’d be interested in having a strip trial or comparison trail on your farm, please reach-out to myself and/or your local Pioneer agent and we’ll put a plan in place.

 

Random Agricultural Facts – Daylight Savings Time History

Most all states in the US implement Daylight Saving Time (DST), but can you name the two that don’t?   If Hawaii was the first state that came to mind that would be correct as they are our country’s southernmost state and therefore daily sunlight hours do not vary as much throughout the year compared to locations with more northern latitudes.  Arizona (most locations) would be the other state as they feel an energy savings is more consistent during the spring and summer months without the added extra hour of evening daylight.  The fact of cooler temps earlier in the evening and throughout a longer stretch of the nighttime sleep hours should justify the state legislature’s actions.

Most of the US territories also do not observe DST: Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, US Virgin Islands, and the Northern Marina Islands – also due to their daylight hours being fairly consistent over the course of a 12-month period.  Any potential advantages of DST in these locations would be very minimal.  With today’s amenities imbedded in our culture, one would think DST’s impact in saving energy is fairly minimal.

Across the globe, DST is primarily implemented in North American and Europe.  It’s interesting to note that countries such as Iceland, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Russia no longer implement DST, despite their northern latitudinal location.



https://www.timeanddate.com/time/change/usa https://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst/statistics.html




No comments:

Post a Comment